NEERU SHARMA,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 55(5) , NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment was invalid because the approval from the prescribed authority under section 151 was mechanical and lacked independent application of mind. This decision was based on a Supreme Court ruling.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2011-12 concerned proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act. The primary issue raised was the validity of the reopening of assessment.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was the validity of the reopening of assessment due to a non-application of independent mind by the prescribed authority while granting approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2962/Del/2026 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Smt. Neeru Sharma, Vs. Income Tax Officer, D-195, 1st Floor, Ward-55(5), Vivek Vihar, Phase-1, Delhi Delhi PAN: AATPS4329P (Appellant) (Respondent)
Assessee by Sh. P.C. Yadav, Adv. Sh. R.K. Vashisth, Adv. Sh. Subas Chandra Acharya, AR Sh. Mayank Sharma, Adv. Department by Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Date of hearing 29.06.2026 Date of pronouncement 29.06.2026 ORDER
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2011-12, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT(A)- 1, Jaipur’s order dated 11.03.2026 having DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1087192990(1), involving proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
ITA No.2962/Del/2026
It emerges during the course of hearing that there arises the first and foremost issue of the validity of the impugned reopening itself, which goes to the root of the matter. This is for the precise reason that the learned counsel representing assessee has invited our attention to the prescribed authority’s section 151 approval dated 28.03.2018 to the Assessing Officer’s reopening proposal, wherein, she has recorded “I am satisfied………” than having applied its independent mind thereupon (page 13 in paper-book). 3. Thus, I am of the considered view that the impugned reopening itself is invalid since based on a mere mechanical approval of the said prescribed authority in light of CIT Vs. S. Goyanka Lime and Chemical Pvt. Ltd. (2015) 64 taxmann.com 313 (SC) to quash the same in very terms. Ordered accordingly. All other pleadings on merits stand rendered academic. 4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on 29th June, 2026 Sd/- (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 15th July, 2026. RK/- Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 2 | P a g e
ITA No.2962/Del/2026
DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
3 | P a g e
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026