ICMAI REGISTERED VALUERS ORGANISATION ,DELHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION) , DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. Since the grievance was resolved by the grant of registration, the appeal was rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal challenging an order by the CIT(Exemptions). During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee was granted registration under section 12AB(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal becomes infructuous when the assessee's grievance is resolved during the pendency of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “H” NEWDELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH “H” NEWDELHI
BEFORE SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No.1000/Del/2026 Assessment Year: --
ICMAI Registered Valuers Vs. CIT(Exemptions), Organisation, New Delhi 4th Floor 3rd Institutional Area Civic Centre Lodhi Road-110003 PAN No. AAECI7760C
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by Ms. Monalisa, Adv.
Respondent by Sh. Bhopal Singh, CIT DR
Date of hearing 25.06.2026 Date of pronouncement 25.06.2026
ORDER PER SUDHIR KUMAR JM: The assessee preferred the appeal, challenging the order dated 27-11-2025 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) New Delhi.
The assessee has moved the application to withdraw this appeal. In the application the assessee has stated that during the pendency of this appeal the registration under section 12AB(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was granted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) to the assessee. The grievance raised by the assessee no longer survives. 3. We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. As per assessee the registration has already been granted under section 12AB91)(b) of the Income Tax, 1961 the appeal has come infructuous. The application filed by the assessee is liable to be allowed. 4. The application of the assessee is allowed and appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn. In the result the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 25 /06/2026.
Sd/- Sd/-
(MANISH AGARWAL) (SUDHIR KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIALMEMBER Dated: 15/07 /2026 “SR BHATNAGGR” Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Delhi 2
More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)
- Sat Guru Saran Niwas Trust, Agra vs CIT(Exemption), AgraITA 674/AGR/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- S S Shah P M Jariwala N S Damanwala Surat V… vs CIT(Exemptions), MumbaiITA 8678/MUM/2026[2027 - 28]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026