DCIT, JHANDEWALAN vs. CHETAN SHARMA, NOIDA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found the appeal filed by the Revenue to be defective. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against an order passed by the Ld. CIT(A). The appeal was filed for the Assessment Year 2019.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the defectiveness of the appeal filed by the Revenue, leading to its dismissal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SMT. RENU JAUHRI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 9108/Del/2025 (A.Y 2019)
DCIT Vs. Chetan Sharma Room No. 330, E-2, A-36, Sector-52, Noida, Jhandewalan Extension Uttar Pradesh ARA Centre, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AATPS5739B
Assessee by : None Revenue by: Shri Om Prakash, CIT (DR)
Date of Hearing 15/07/2026 Date of pronouncement 15/07/2026
O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, J. M.: The instant appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 22.07.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals)-24, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)]
under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) arising out of the Assessment Order dated 29.03.2023 passed by the Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ld. AO’) under Section 153C r.w. Section 143(3) of the Act for Assessment Year 2019.
2 ITA No. 9108/Del/2025 DCIT Vs. Chetan Sharma 2. Having regard to the appeal preferred by the Revenue being
defective the same is dismissed with a liberty to the Department to
file afresh, if so advised.
The Appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed as defective.
Order pronounced in the open court on 15/07/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (RENU JAUHRI) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 15/07/2026 R. Naheed, Sr PS Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026