INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1),, RAIPUR vs. SHRI RAKESH AMRANI, RAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s reasoning for treating the transactions as hawala business and taxing only commission was not convincing. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee was found to be operating bank accounts of others, allegedly for hawala transactions, earning commission. The Assessing Officer made additions based on these transactions, which the CIT(A) partly deleted, considering it as commission income from hawala business.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting additions made by the AO and treating the transactions as hawala business, taxing only commission income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, रायपुर "ायपीठ, रायपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR "ी पाथ" सारथी चौधरी, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी अवधेश कुमार िम", लेखा सद" के सम" BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM & SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No: 90/RPR/2020 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2016-17)
Rakesh Kumar Amrani, Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(3), 42, Near Amar Kutir, Street No.3, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Katora Talab, Raipur-492001, C.G. Raipur – 492001. C.G. PAN: AFIPA9762Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri Sunil Kumar Agrawal, CA. राज" की ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Ram Tiwari, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 23/04/2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of : 16/07/2026 Pronouncement AND आयकर अपील सं./ITA No: 97/RPR/2020 (िनधा"रण वष" Assessment Year: 2016-17) Income Tax Officer, Ward-4(1), Vs Rakesh Kumar Amrani, Central Revenue Building, 42, Near Amar Kutir, Street No.3, Civil Lines, Raipur – 492001. C.G. Katora Talab, Raipur-492001. C.G. PAN: AFIPA9762Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : राज" की ओर से / Revenue by : Shri Ram Tiwari, CIT-DR िनधा"रती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026