DILIPKUMAR HARILAL TANIYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3)(6), SURAT, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SURAT
What were the facts?
The assessee received ex-gratia payments under a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) from BSNL and initially offered them to tax. Later, upon learning that such payments might be exempt under Section 10(10B), the assessee sought exemption, but the appeals to the CIT(A) were dismissed due to delay.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) due to the assessee's lack of awareness of the legal position. It held that the VRS compensation received by BSNL employees is in the nature of retrenchment compensation eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B).
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) was justifiable, and whether compensation received under BSNL's VRS-2019 scheme qualifies for exemption under Section 10(10B) as retrenchment compensation.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: The captioned two (2) appeals are filed by assessee; the details of these appeals are as under:
(i) ITA 316/SRT/2026 is directed against the order of first appeal dated 17.02.2026 passed by learned (Appeals)-Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Jaipur [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of intimation of assessment dated
Dilipkumar Harilal Tania ITA Nos. 300 & 316/Srt/2026 – AY 2021-22 & 2020-21
2020 passed by learned CPC, Bengaluru [“AO”] u/s 143(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2020-21. (ii) ITA 300/SRT/2026 is directed against the order of first appeal dated 17.02.2026 pass
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026