BHARAT NARHARIPRASAD PANDYA,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE WARD 1(1), BHARUCH, BHARUCH
What were the facts?
The assessee received ex-gratia payments under a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) from BSNL. Initially, the assessee claimed exemption under Section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act. Later, upon learning that such receipts might be fully exempt under Section 10(10B), the assessee sought exemption under the latter section, but the appeals were dismissed by the CIT(A) due to delay.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) due to the assessee's bona fide lack of awareness of the legal position. On merits, following various ITAT decisions, the Tribunal held that compensation received by BSNL employees under VRS, 2019, is in the nature of retrenchment compensation eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B).
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-gratia payment received under BSNL's VRS, 2019, is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B) as retrenchment compensation, and whether the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: The captioned two (2) appeals are filed by assessee; the details of these appeals are as under:
(i) ITA 294/SRT/2026 is directed against the order of first appeal dated 16.02.2026 passed by learned (Appeals)-Addl/JCIT(A)-3, Bengaluru [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arise out of the intimation of assessment
Bharat Narhariprasad Pandya ITA Nos. 294 & 295/Srt/2026 – AY 2020-21 & 2021-22
dated 28.10.2021 passed by learned CPC, Bengaluru [“AO”] u/s 143(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2020-21. (ii) ITA 295/SRT/2026 is directed against the order of first appeal dated 16.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026