DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR, MUZAFFARPUR vs. RAJESH AGRAWAL, MUZAFFARPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment based on seized materials. However, it found that some additions were made without sufficient corroborative evidence or proper verification, leading to partial relief for the assessee.
What were the facts?
A search action was conducted on the assessee, a businessman dealing in Gutka and Pan Masala, leading to the discovery of incriminating documents. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment and made several additions, including unexplained expenses, undisclosed turnover, and unexplained money.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated based on search materials and the sustainability of additions made on account of alleged undisclosed income and expenses without adequate evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “PATNA” BENCH, PATNA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
These are the cross appeals preferred by the assessee and revenue against the separate orders of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Patna-3, (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. Rajesh Agrawal; A.Ys. 2018-19 to 2023-24 CIT(A)]dated 16.05.2025 &19.05.2025, for A.Ys. 2018-19, 2019- 20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23 & 2023-24.We shall decide the appeals of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026