AMARJIT SINGH, SIRSA,SIRSA vs. JAO THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 SIRSA, SIRSA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 195/CHANDI/2026Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 July 2026AY 2013-20143 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal followed a coordinate bench's decision, holding that 50% of the interest on enhanced compensation is taxable. The Tribunal also found no infirmity in the reopening of the assessment.

What were the facts?

The assessee received interest on enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act. The Assessing Officer taxed 50% of this interest under Section 56(2)(viii), a view upheld by the CIT(A). The assessee appealed this decision.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the taxability of interest on enhanced compensation. A secondary issue concerned the validity of the assessment reopening.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 56(2)(viii),Section 147,Section 144B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, CHANDIGARH

आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

ITAT CHANDIGARH

More judgments on Section 56(2)(viii)

All 364 judgments and leading authorities on Section 56(2)(viii) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →