LEGRAND NETHERLANDS B.V.,NETHERLANDS vs. ACIT (IT) CIRCLE 3(1)(2), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee declared income as capital gains, but the AO reclassified a portion as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(d). The total income remained the same, but its composition changed. The tax paid by the assessee was higher than that calculated by the AO after reclassification.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that reclassification of income from capital gains to dividend, where the tax liability did not increase and there was no suppression or concealment of income, does not constitute under-reporting of income for the purpose of levying penalty under section 270A.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under section 270A is leviable solely on account of reclassification of income when the total income and tax liability do not increase, and there is no suppression of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SMT.BEENA PILLAI, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM
Per Arun Khodpia, AM: This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals – 57, Mumbai [in short, “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 10.12.2025 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18, arises from the order under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, “the Act”] dated 25.07.2024, passed by Assessing Officer [in short, “the Ld.AO”]. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as under:
“1. Ground No. 1-Imposition of penalty under section 270A of the Act
On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ('Ld. CIT(A)')
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- ACIT, Guwahati vs Harvinder Singh Sehgal, Thangal Bazar…ITA 379/GTY/2025[2021]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026
- Harvinder Singh Sehgal, Manipur vs Central Circle-2, GuwahatiITA 374/GTY/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026