M/S. AVAYA INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee capitalized an exchange loss to the cost of certain assets under Section 43A of the Income-tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed depreciation on this capitalized amount, treating the exchange loss as notional and unsubstantiated. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) directed the AO to re-compute the disallowance after correcting the depreciation rate.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had correctly capitalized the exchange loss as per Section 43A and had not claimed it separately as revenue loss. Therefore, disallowing depreciation on the capitalized amount was not proper.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation is allowable on an exchange loss capitalized to the cost of assets under Section 43A when the loss is realized and substantiated.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘I’: NEW DELHI
PER S.RIFAURRAHMAN,AM:
The assessee filed misc. Application in ITA No.1958/Del/2017 passed vide order dated 17.01.2020 and the coordinate bench vide order dated 30.07.2025 in MA No.80/Del/2021 recalled the order to the limited extent of adjudicating ground no.5 raised by the assessee pertaining to the disallowance of depreciation of Rs.2,42,421/- on the issue of exchange loss capitalised to the cost of assets under section 43A of the Income-tax
2 Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’). Accordingly, the present appeal is listed to the limited extent of deciding ground no.5 which is reproduced below:- “That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. AO and Hon’b
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43A
- Apraava Renewable Energy Private Limited… vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(2), AhmedabadITA 92/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 May 2026AY 2017-18
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2… vs Unimed Technologies Limited, PanchmahalITA 279/AHD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed3 Mar 2026AY 2016-17
- Cisco Systems (India) Private Limited… vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1234/BANG/2025[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Jan 2026
- Aban Singapore Pte Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT Intl Tax 1(1), ChennaiITTPA 12/CHNY/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Jan 2026AY 2022-23
- Evry India Private Limited, Bangalore vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 837/BANG/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed31 Dec 2025AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Nagarbhavi Club (R) vs. The State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 6 Oct 2026
- Newton Engineering And Chemicals Limited vs. Indian Oil Corporation LTD.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Life Insurance Corporation Of INDIA vs. N.S. Associates PVT. LTDDelhi · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Ideal Pharma, Through Its Proprietor Manish Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Surya Agro Fuels vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesMadras · 6 Oct 2026