ASACIT, O/O ITO, WARD-2(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. MOHANARAO VADDI, VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the monetary limit specified in the CBDT Circulars. The Revenue was granted liberty to point out any exceptions that might apply.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT. The assessee contended that the tax effect involved in the appeal was below the monetary ceiling prescribed by CBDT Circulars. The Revenue's representative conceded that the tax effect was below the limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is maintainable given the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM:
The captioned appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, New Delhi (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 22/01/2026, which in turn arise from the respective orders passed by the Assessing Officer (for short “AO”) under section 147 r.w.s
ITA 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026