VIJAYA RAGAVA SAI KUMAR JANNUMAHANTY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without appreciating that the assessee claimed no advance tax was payable due to TDS on salary. The matter was remanded to the CIT(A) for adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file his return of income for AY 2018-19. The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings and passed an order. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal on technical grounds for non-compliance with Section 249(4)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal on technical grounds without adjudicating the merits, and if Section 249(4)(b) was applicable when tax was already deducted at source.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 270A,Section 249(4),Section 148A,Section 148,Section 139(1),Section 192,Section 209
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, िवशाखाप"नम पीठ, िवशाखाप"नम INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH: DIVN BEFORE SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) VIJAYA RAGAVA SAI KUMAR INCOME TAX OFFICER, JANNUMAHANTY WARD-3(3) VISAKHAPATNAM-530040, ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: BGYPJ6651D
ITA 50/VIZ/2026 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19) VIJAYA RAGAVA SAI KUMAR INCOME TAX OFFICER, JANNUMAHANTY WARD-3(3) VISAKHAPATNAM-530040, ANDHRA PRADESH अपीलाथ" Appellant ""थ" Respondent
Permanent Account Number of Assessee: BGYPJ6651D
अपीलाथ" "ारा/Appellant represented by: Shri C Subrahmanyam, CA ""थ" "ारा/Respondent represented by: Shri A.P. Babu, Sr AR
सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 09-July-2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 17-July-2026 VIJAYA RAGAVA
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026