KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI BILSI,BADAYUN, UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO-2(3), BADAYUN-1, BADAYUN, UTTAR PRADESH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that there is no statutory precondition preventing an assessee from claiming exemption under Section 10(26AAB) even if they have claimed exemption under Section 11(1). The assessee was deemed eligible for the exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, claimed exemption under Section 10(26AAB) of the Income Tax Act. The lower authorities denied this exemption because the assessee had also claimed exemption under Section 11(1) as a registered trust.
What were the issues?
Whether claiming exemption under Section 11(1) disqualifies an assessee from claiming exemption under Section 10(26AAB). Applicability of Section 10(26AAB) to a Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2018-19, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1082761778(1), dated 19.11.2025 involving proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires at the outset during the course of hearing that the assessee/appellant is aggrieved against both the learned lower authority’s respective assessment and lower appellate findings denying exemption u/s 10(26AAB) for the precise reason that it had claimed exemption u/s 11(1) as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(26AAB)
- Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Badaun, Badaun vs ITO-2(3) Badayun-1, BadaunITA 3744/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Jul 2026AY 2019-20
- Market Committee Mandi Dabwali, Dabwali vs ITO Ward -1, SirsaITA 1329/CHANDI/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed2 Jul 2026AY 2016-17
- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies… vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ward-1…ITA 169/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2019-20
- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies… vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ward-1, EluruITA 168/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2019-20
- Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies… vs Income Tax Officer (TDS), Ward-1…ITA 167/VIZ/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 May 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026