ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19(1), DELHI vs. P. C. GLOBAL MERCHANDISING PVT LTD , DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty order, being based on the assessment order, could not survive if the assessment order's foundation (the quantum addition) was removed. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against a penalty order under Section 270A. The assessee argued that the penalty was based on a quantum addition that had already been deleted by a co-ordinate bench of the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under Section 270A can be sustained when the underlying assessment order, upon which it is based, has been deleted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, िद�ी पीठ�, नई िद�ी INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCHES, ‘G’ NEW DELHI BEFORE MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2988/DEL/2026 िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2020-21) ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF P. C. GLOBAL INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 19(1) MERCHANDISING PVT LTD ROOM NO. 221, 2ND FLOOR, C. R. B - 24, PANCHSHEEL ENCLAVE Vs. BUILDING, NEW DELHI-110002 NEW DELHI 110017 अपीलाथ� Appellant ��थ� Respondent Permanent Account Number of Assessee: AACCP9641D
अपीलाथ� �ारा/Appellant represented by: Shri Raghuveer Singh, Sr. DR ��थ� �ारा/Respondent represented by: Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. & Sh. Deepesh Garg, Adv. सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusion of hearing: 08.07.2026 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement: 17.07.2026 आदेश / ORDER PER AMITABH SHUKLA, AM This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, New Delhi, dated 02.01.2026 arising out of penalty order dated 13.03.2025 passed u/s 270A of the Act, for Assessment Year 2020-21. The word ‘Act’ herein this order would mean Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the appeal of the Revenue deserves to be dismissed in view of the fact that the quantum addition made by the ld. AO through his order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 27.09.2022 read 1
ITA 2988/DEL/2026 P. C. GLOBAL MERCHANDISING PVT LTD
with section 154 dated 04.05.2023 stands deleted by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in its decision in ITA No.3072/Del/2025 dated 25.02.2026. The ld. Counsel submitted that this without prejudice that the ld. CIT(A) has allowed its appeal vide his order dated 02.01.2026, wherein, the assessee had contested invocation of penalty u/s 270A in its case. 3. The ld. DR places reliance upon the order of the ld. Assessing Officer. 4. We have heard rival submissions in the light of material placed on record. We have noted that in this case, the penalty for under reporting of income u/s 270A is resting upon the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 27.09.2022 read with section 154 dated 04.05.2023. The impugned assessment order thus becomes the foundation for the super structure of penalty u/s 270A built upon it. It is trite law that when the foundation collapses, the super structure cannot survive. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the Revenue. 5. In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 17th July, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- [KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL] [AMITABH SHUKLA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 17.07.2026 Shekhar Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. PCIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi, Page 2 of 2
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026