GREEN AGREVOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED,INDIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that ESOP expenditure, representing employee compensation accrued over the vesting period, is an allowable business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance by the lower authorities was deemed incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Green Agrevolution Private Limited, claimed ESOP expenditure of INR 19,51,19,001/-. The Assessing Officer disallowed this expenditure, considering it contingent and capital in nature. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether ESOP expenditure, treated as contingent by the revenue, is an allowable deduction as a business expense. The Tribunal also considered the applicability of accounting standards and judicial precedents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA “DB” BENCH
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI YOGESH KUAMR U.S.
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This Appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi [“the Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 26.02.2026 with DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1086577664(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the assessment year 2022-23 on following Grounds of Appeal:- Each of the ground and sub ground of appeals are independent and without prejudice to the other: -
On the facts and circumstances of the case & in law, the order passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (Ld. CIT(A)], is unjust, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Act, and bad
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 37(1)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Smit Navnitlal Soni, Ahmedabad, Gujarat vs ITO Ward-5(3)(1), Ahmedabad, GujaratITA 1434/AHD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Rajesh Maru, Mhow vs ITO-5(1), IndoreITA 839/IND/2025[2023-2024]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2023-2024
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026