ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA, PATNA vs. JAIDAYAL PACKAGING PVT. LTD, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the land sold was indeed rural agricultural land, exempt from capital gains tax, as it was beyond the specified distance from municipal limits as per CBDT notifications. The Tribunal also dismissed the grounds related to speculative loss, finding no material to contradict the CIT(A)'s findings.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding profit on sale of rural agricultural land and speculation loss. The AO had disallowed the exemption for agricultural land sale due to insufficient evidence and treated share trading losses as speculative. The CIT(A) had deleted these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the land sold was a capital asset and whether the losses claimed from share trading were speculative.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(14),Section 133A,Section 131(1A),Section 143(1),Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)] dated 29.08.2024, DIN & order No.
2 Jaidayal Packaging Pvt. Ltd. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1068114536(1) on the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of profit arising on sale of rural agricultural land. The AO in his order has clearly mentioned that despite calling for the records of purchase deed, sale deed, computation o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(14)
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ishvarbhai Bhagabhai Patel, Surat vs The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(1), SuratITA 6/SRT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Malini Satish Parekh, Surat vs ITO, Ward 2(3), SuratITA 900/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Lakhmanbhai Maru, Vadodara vs ITO, Ward 1(2)(1), Vadodara, Aayakar…ITA 1046/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026