YOGESH GOPINATH TADVALKAR ,PUNE vs. THE ITO WARD 3(3) , PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following Supreme Court judgments, held that substantial justice should be preferred over technical considerations. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file his income tax return for AY 2015-16. The Assessing Officer reopened the case and made an addition of Rs. 80.00 lakhs as short-term capital gain due to non-response to notices. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a delay of 182 days.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned to decide the case on merits, considering the principles of substantial justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अपील र्थी / The Appellant; 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2. 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. 5. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, //True Copy // Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
6 ITA No.1429/PUN/2026 Yogesh Gopinath Tadvalkar
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 20.07.2026 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 20.07.2026 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before 21.07.2026 3 JM/AM the Second Member Draft discussed/approved by 21.07.2026 4 AM/AM Second Member Approved Draft comes to the 21.07.2026 5 Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on 21.07.2026 Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order 22.07.2026 Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk 22.07.2026 Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to 9 the Office Superintendent Date on which file goes to the 10 A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026