PRASHANT SAHKARI AWAS SAMITI LTD.,KANPUR vs. ICT-2 KANPUR, KANPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessments were reopened based on a CIT(A) direction to tax escaped income from property sales. The ITAT had previously held these directions illegal and expunged them. The reassessment notices were issued beyond the limitation period.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the ITAT's prior order expunging the CIT(A)'s directions rendered them invalid as a basis for reassessment. Consequently, reassessment notices issued after the limitation period were void.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings initiated based on a prior CIT(A) direction, which was subsequently held illegal by the ITAT, are valid. Whether reassessment notices issued beyond the prescribed limitation period are void.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 150(1),Section 153(3)(ii),Section 149
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW ‘A’ BENCH, LUCKNOW
Before: SH. KUL BHARAT & SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER NIKHIL CHOUDHARY, A.M.: These appeals have been filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld. CIT(A) passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, wherein in all four assessment years, the ld. CIT(A) has restored the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer for factual verification while allowing the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes. As there are common issues involved in all these cases, the cases are taken up together for disposal. The grounds of appeal are as under:
“1. BECAUSE the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (A) has erred on fact and in law in not appreciating that the sole basis of reassessment, i.e. direction in order
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pabitra Kumar Prusty vs. The Chief Commissioner , CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Innojet Projects Private Limited, Khorda vs. The Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Appeal) Central Tax And Goods And Services Tax, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S.Ganjam Galaxy Bhapur Barkatulla Street, Ganjam vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Lalu Kumar Bagh vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Koraput Range, KoraputOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Bhanu Metal Industries And Ors vs. Union Of INDIA And OrsCalcutta · 7 Oct 2026