What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Senior Departmental Representative did not object to the withdrawal.

The assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against the order of the CIT(A). At the time of hearing, the assessee's representative requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed before the tribunal.

Anandaloke Sonoscan Centre Pvt… vs DCIT | ITAT Kolkata 2026

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY

For Appellant: Shri Sujit Basu, Advocate & Shri Rajib

For Respondent: Ms Ruchika Sharma, Sr. DR

Hearing: 25.06.2026Pronounced: 22.07.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.72/KOL/2026 Assessment Year: (2018-19) Anandaloke Sonoscan Centre Pvt. DCIT, Ltd., Vs. Central Circle – 4(4), 3/3, Hill Cart Road, Siliguri – Kolkata 734001, West Bengal [PAN: AABCA9196K] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri Sujit Basu, Advocate & Shri Rajib Mukherjee, Advocate Respondent by: Ms Ruchika Sharma, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 25.06.2026 Date of Pronouncement 22.07.2026 O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “ld. CIT(A)”], dated 10.11.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.

At the outset of hearing, the learned Authorized Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee submitted that assessee seeks permission to withdraw this appeal, to which, the learned Senior Departmental Representative (ld. Sr. DR) did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal as ‘withdrawn’.

ITA No.72/Kol/2026/A.Y.2018-19 Anandaloke Sonoscan Centre Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

The order is pronounced in the open Court on 22/07/2026.

Sd/- Sd/- (Pradip Kumar Choubey) (Rajesh Kumar) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUTANT MEMBER Kolkata, Dated: 22/07/2026 SAMANTA आदेश�ȧĤǓ�ͧ �ͪ �\ Ē ȯͪ��/Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. \ �Ȣ�ȡ�ȸ/ The Appellant 2. Ĥ×��ȸ/ The Respondent. 3. Ȳ�Ȳͬ��आयकर] �ǕÈ�/ Concerned CIT 4. आयकर] �ǕÈ�(अपील) / The CIT(A) ��ȡ�Ȣ�ĤǓ�Ǔ�ͬ �, आयकर\ �Ȣ�ȣ�\ͬ ��,/ DR, ITAT, Kolkata 5. 6. �ȡ�[फाईल/ Guard file.

BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Kolkata

ANANDALOKE SONOSCAN CENTRE PVT. LTD.,SILIGURI vs. D.C.I.T., CC - 4(4),, KOLKATA

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Recent GST High Court judgments