JAYAPRAKASH RAMAPPA,BANGALORE vs. ITO WARD 2(1)(1) BANGALORE, BANGALORE
What were the facts?
Various BSNL employees retired under a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) and received retrenchment compensation and leave encashment. They claimed exemptions under Sections 10(10B) and 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, but their appeals were dismissed by the NFAC on grounds of limitation and maintainability.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the NFAC erred in dismissing the appeals on technical grounds like limitation and maintainability, especially when similar delays were condoned for other BSNL employees. The Tribunal allowed the exemptions claimed under Sections 10(10B) and 10(10AA) for retrenchment compensation and leave encashment, respectively.
What were the issues?
Whether the NFAC was justified in dismissing appeals on grounds of limitation and maintainability, and whether the assessees are entitled to exemptions for retrenchment compensation and leave encashment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘SMC’ BENCH : BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year R S Badarinatha, 208, Srinivasa, The Income Tax 2020-21 ITA Nos. 1624 & 5th Main, 1st Stage, Officer, & 1625/Bang/2026 Nivedithanagara, Ward – 1(1), 2021-22 Mysore – 570 008. Mysore. PAN: AEKPB3613C Ms. Deepa Sunil Patgaonkar, Chaitanya, Block No. 19, Mahalaxmi The Income Tax Residency Layout, ITA No. Officer, 2020-21 Near Royal Height Apartment, 1646/Bang/2026 Ward – 1, Shabari Nagar Road, Hubli, Davangere. Dharwad – 580 023. PAN: AFVPP5317H Shri Veeranna Hanumanthappa, No. 5 1 cross, Adishakthi The Income Tax Nagar, ITA No. Officer, Challakere Road, 2020-21 1662/Bang/2026 Ward – 1, College Road, S.O., Chitradurga. Chitradurga. Karnataka – 577 501. PAN: ACPPV4164R Aswatha Kumar, #378, 19th Cross, The Income Tax ITA No. Vijaynagar Railway Layout, Officer, 2020-21 1663/Bang/2026 Metagalli S.O., Ward – 1(1), Mysore – 570 016. Mysore. PAN: ADVPK4803D
Faridayashmin G Khatib, 1403, Fernhill Apartment, The Income Tax Karavali lane, ITA No. Officer, Nera nathoor Junction, 2020-21 1664/Bang/202
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026