GAUSHALLA & MANDIR SUDHAR COMMITTEE,MANSA GAUSAHALLA ROAD vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH, VTH FLOOR, C R BUILDING, HIMALYA MARG SECTOR E
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had not properly appreciated the facts and that the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration as a charitable and religious entity. However, the CIT(E) granted registration only as a religious entity without providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in granting registration as a religious entity instead of a charitable and religious entity without affording natural justice to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH ‘DB’ : AMRITSAR
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM:
The assessee has filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 06.01.2026 and 08.01.2026 for the Assessment Year
2027-28 passed under section 12AA and 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’).
At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the ld. CIT
(E) erred in law and on facts in allowing the registration to the assessee
Trust as Religious Entity as against the assessee application filed in Form
No.10AB u/s 12AB(1)(b) of the Act for registration as Charitable and Religious Entity without giving any opportunity to the asse
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026