LALA SANT RAM TIRATHRAM PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. EXEMPTION WARD, AMRITSAR , AMRITSAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that making donations to other charitable institutions is permissible under the amended provisions of the Act. It also noted that the CIT(E) did not provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard and failed to call for further information before rejecting the application.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a public charitable trust, sought continuation of its registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application, observing that the trust primarily made donations to other institutions rather than carrying out direct charitable activities, and cancelled its registration.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in cancelling the registration for making donations to other trusts, and whether a reasonable opportunity of being heard was provided to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB,Section 80G,Section 2(15),Section 11,Section 12,Section 12A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH ‘DB’ : AMRITSAR
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM:
The assessee has filed appeals against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 13.01.2026 for the Assessment Year 2026-27 passed under section 12AB and 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’).
At the time of hearing, ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee trust/institution is registered under the provisions of the Act and has sought continuation of registration u/s 12AB of the Act. He submitted that to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee, a notice dated 30.12.2025 was issued for pr
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026