KAAVISH FOUNDATION C/O GHULAM NABI DHARANA,POONCH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal. The tribunal restored the issue to the file of the CIT(Exemptions) to provide the assessee with an opportunity of being heard on merit.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(Exemptions). The appeal was filed with a delay of 64 days. The assessee did not appear before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) passed an ex-parte order without affording an opportunity of being heard to the assessee, and if so, whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH ‘DB’ : AMRITSAR
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM:
The assessee has filed appeal against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [“Ld. CIT(E)”, for short] dated 26.09.2025 for the Assessment Year 2025-26. 2. None present on behalf of the assessee. After going through the record, we find that the issue is very small which can be decided with the help of ld. DR of the Revenue. We proceeded to hear the matter with the assistance of ld. DR of the Revenue.
We observed that the present appeal is barred by 64 days and an application for condonation of delay is filed by the assessee along with affidavit in support. After
2 going through the condonation application and the affidav
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026