INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. PCIT, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO had taken a plausible view and the assessee's treatment of bad debts recovered and interest accrued was consistent. Therefore, the PCIT's order under Section 263 was erroneous and prejudicial to the assessee's interest.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) invoked Section 263 to revise the Assessing Officer's (AO) order. The PCIT questioned the taxability of bad debts recovered and the treatment of interest accrued but not due on securities.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT erred in invoking Section 263 without establishing the AO's order as erroneous and prejudicial, and whether the taxability of bad debts recovered and interest accrued was correctly handled by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: HONOURABLE GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
PER GAGAN GOYAL, AM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. PCIT, (hereinafter referred as the ‘Ld. PCIT’), Chennai-4 dated 03.03.2026 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred as the ‘AY’) 2022-23. GROUNDS OF APPEAL
On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. PCIT erred in invoking the provisions of section 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026