SH. RATTAN SINGH,HARYANA vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), HARYANA
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals for assessment years 2014-15 to 2016-17 were filed late due to notices from the CIT(A) being sent to an incorrect email address. The assessee only became aware of the orders when a notice under Section 221(1) was received.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, citing the bonafide reasons provided by the assessee and the liberal interpretation of 'sufficient cause'. The ex-parte orders of the CIT(A) were set aside.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned due to non-service of notices on the correct email address, and whether the ex-parte orders passed by the CIT(A) should be set aside.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY
PER SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These three appeal by the assessee for AY 2014-15 to 2016-17 are directed against ex- parte orders of the CIT(A) for the respective assessment years.
The appeal of the assessee for the AY 2014-15 is time barred by 369 days. The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay citing reasons for delay in filing of appeal. The delay in filing of appeal has been attributed to non-service of order passed by the CIT(A).
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 221(1)
- Ruby Singh, Delhi vs DCIT, CC-8, DelhiITA 3044/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- Ruby Singh, Delhi vs DCIT, CC-8, DelhiITA 3043/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- Ruby Singh, Delhi vs DCIT, CC-8, DelhiITA 3042/DEL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamuben Ramanlal Patel, Daman vs Income Tax Officer, DamanITA 798/SRT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed10 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- Bank of Baroda (E-Vijaya Bank), Delhi vs Addl Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1864/DEL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026