AL MASOOMEEN YATEEM TRUST,SRINGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) erred in cancelling the registration without issuing a show-cause notice, violating principles of natural justice. The Tribunal found evidence of charitable activities like running an orphanage and decided to remand the matter for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) and approval under Section 80G(5). The CIT(E) rejected the application, holding that the trust's activities were religious, not charitable, and not genuine. The assessee argued that the CIT(E) was misled by Arabic terms in the financials and that charitable activities like running an orphanage were being conducted.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust's activities were genuinely charitable and carried out in accordance with its objectives, and whether the cancellation of registration followed due process.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii),Section 80G(5),Section 2(15),Section 12AB(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN 'THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR REFORE SH; S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH UDAYAN DAS GUPTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER LTA_ No.SI and 52/Asr/2026 Assessment Year: N/A Al Masoomeen Yateem Trust;, No. & Block A USt Floor; Municipality Complex Hazuri Bagh, Srinagar; Kashmir: [PAN:-AABTA8247N] (Appellant Vs: CIT (Exeption), Chandigarh: (Respondent) Appellant by Respondent by Sh. Abdul Majid ZargarCA Mrs. Roshanta Kumari Meena,CIT: DR Date 0f Hearing 20.07.2026 Date of Pronouncement RL0Z2026 ORDER Peri Udayan Dasgupta_JM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld CIT (E), Chandigarh, dated 09/12/2025, rejecting the application for registration dated 22/09/2025 filed by the assessee in Form 1OAB, us 12A(1) (ac) (ii) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (henceforth the Act) . 2 . The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in the memorandum of appeal in form 36 are as follows: 1 ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND FACTS OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LD. CIT(E) HAS GROSSLY ERRED IN LT.A- No.51 and 52/Asr/2026 Assessment Year: N/A REJECTING RENEWAL OF REGISTRATION OF THE ASSESSEE TRUST 2 . ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND FACTS OF THE CASE AND IN LAW, THE LD. CIT(
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026