VIJAYA SAI TRADERS,GUNTUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-(1), GUNTUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT held that the assessee's appeal was not maintainable because the grounds of appeal did not challenge the order of the CIT(A), but rather the order of the Assessing Officer. The ITAT emphasized that the order of the CIT(A) merges the order of the Assessing Officer, and only the CIT(A)'s order should be challenged in further appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed to the ITAT after the CIT(A) dismissed their appeal. The CIT(A) had found that the assessee failed to provide substantive evidence and comply with notices, upholding the Assessing Officer's findings. The assessee's grounds of appeal before the ITAT primarily challenged the Assessing Officer's order, not the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal before the ITAT is maintainable when the grounds of appeal do not challenge the order of the CIT(A) but instead challenge the order of the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE & SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, HON’BLE
PER OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, AM: In the above cited appeal, the appellant has taken the following grounds of appeal before the ITAT: -
“1. The learned Assessing Officer on facts and in circumstances of the case and in law is not justified in treating the difference in capital account as per balance sheet with balance in capital accounts Rs. 2,30,050 which difference is nothing but p
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026