SHREE SAURASHTRA PATEL BHUVAN,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the mistake in selecting the sub-clause was inadvertent and not fatal. The CIT(E) was directed to treat the application under the correct sub-clause and grant registration if other conditions are met.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under section 12AB but mistakenly selected sub-clause (iii) instead of sub-clause (ii) of clause (ac) of Section 12A(1) in Form 10AB. The application was rejected by the CIT(E) on this technical ground.
What were the issues?
Whether a technical error in selecting a sub-clause during the application for registration under section 12AB warrants rejection of the application. Whether the CIT(E) should have allowed the assessee to correct the mistake.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the separate orders of ld. CIT(E). in rejecting the application of assessee trust for registration under section 12AB of Income Tax Act. 2. Rival submissions of both the parties have been heard and record perused. The learned Authorised Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee submits that the assessee filed an application for registration of trust under section 12AB. While filing application Form 10AB by mistake opted sub-clause (iii) in place of sub-clause (ii) of clause (ac) of Section 12A(1). The application of assessee was rejected on technical reason. The assessee while filing application furnished all necessary information and documents. The law full object and genuineness of activities of assessee is not in dispute. The ld. CIT(E) ought to have considered the application under section 12A allowed to
ITA No. 4777/Mum/2026 (AY: 2026-27) Shree Saurashtra Patel Bhuvan
correct the mistake. The ld. AR of the assessee submits that application of assessee may be considered under appropriate provision for allowing registration under sub-clause (ii) of clause (ac) of Section 12A(1). In alternative plea, the ld. AR of the assessee submits that matter may be restored back to the file of ld. CIT(E) with the direction to consider the application of assessee for registration under section 12AB as it has been applied under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act and to allow registration from the date of application. He undertakes on behalf of assessee to furnish all requisite information and evidence for satisfying the object and activities of the assessee. 3. On the other hand, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax – Departmental Representative (CIT-DR) for the revenue supported the order of lower authorities. 4. We have considered the rival submissions of both the parties and have gone through the orders of lower authorities carefully. We find that application of assessee for registration under section 12AB was rejected on the ground that assessee has not applied for registration of trust under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii), rather applied under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii). Considering the plea of ld. AR of the assessee that while filing application under Form 10AD, the applicant of assessee due to inadvertence selected an appropriate sub-clause and the mistake in filing such entry is not fatal, the ld. CIT(E) is directed to treat the application of assessee under section 12A(1)(ac) (ii) and in case the assessee fulfilled other remaining conditions i.e. law full object and genuineness activities are charitable and also fulfil compliance of any other law, allowed
ITA No. 4777/Mum/2026 (AY: 2026-27) Shree Saurashtra Patel Bhuvan
registration under section 12AB to assessee in accordance with law. Needless to direct that before passing the order of ld. CIT(E) shall allow reasonable opportunity to assessee. The assessee is also directed to furnish all necessary details and evidence if required by ld. CIT(E) for satisfaction on object and activities of the assessee trust. In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order was pronounced in the open Court on 24/07/2026 at the time of hearing. Sd/- Sd/- OM PRAKASH KANT PAWAN SINGH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, Dated: 24/07/2026 Biswajit Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Mumbai; and (5) Guard file. By Order
Assistant Registrar ITAT, Mumbai
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026