SANJAY CHHANABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(4), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the documents submitted by the assessee were not presented to the lower authorities. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for re-examination of these documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared agricultural income and cash deposits during demonetization. The Assessing Officer rejected the books of account and estimated profit, also adding unexplained cash credits. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order is invalid due to expanded scrutiny without approval, and whether additions for estimated profit and unexplained cash credit are justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 145(3),Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 143(2),Section 142(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH SMC, SURAT
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [In short, ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] dated 27/02/2025 for the assessment year (AY) 2017-18 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: "1) The Ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. A. O. in expanding the scope of limited scrutiny without taking approval of higher authorities as per the instructions of Honourable CBDT.
2 It is therefore prayed that the assessment order should be trea
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 145(3)
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs DCIT Central Circle 2(1), MumbaiITA 1952/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1951/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1950/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica India Projects Private Limited…ITA 2336/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica Builders Private Limited, AhmedabadITA 2335/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026