RUDRA DEVELOPERS,SURAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer, granting the assessee another opportunity to present all relevant documents. The assessee was directed to produce documents without seeking adjournments to enable the AO to take a reasonable view.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in building construction, filed a return declaring a loss. The return was processed under Section 143(1) with a disallowance of business expenses and a consequential increase in income. The assessee's subsequent rectification petitions were rejected, and appeals to the CIT(A) were dismissed.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of business expenses and the consequent denial of carry forward of business loss were justified, and whether the assessee was denied a reasonable opportunity to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Chennai [In short, ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] dated 13/11//2025 for the assessment year (AY) 2013-14 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned ADDL/JCIT (A)-2, Chennai has erred in confirming the action of Id. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat by disallowing other business expenses of Rs. 1,82,32,230/- and not rectifying the same despite specific rectification request made in this regard.
On t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026