KEYUR RAJENDRAPRASAD YAGNIK,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(2), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issues to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication, directing that the assessee be provided with adequate opportunity of being heard. This was done considering the CIT(A) had also remanded an issue for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened based on information about cash commission received from diagnostics centers. The Assessing Officer added commission income and disallowed medicine expenses. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, confirming a portion of the medicine expense disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment and subsequent additions were valid, and whether the assessee was provided with adequate opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 132,Section 133A,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH SMC, SURAT
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Ahmedabad [In short, ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] dated 22/09/2025 for the assessment year (AY) 2014-15 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in 2 Keyur Rajendraprasad Yagnik Vs ITO reopening the assessment u/s 147 of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026