SUNIL JAYANTILAL SHAH,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(1)(4), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) decided the issue on merit without hearing the assessee due to non-compliance. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to present their case.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on information that the assessee received accommodation entries for commodity profit. The AO added the profit as unexplained cash credit, and the CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal for non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte without adequate opportunity to the assessee, and whether the addition on account of commodity profit as unexplained cash credit is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Surat [In short, ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] dated 01/09/2025 for the assessment year (AY) 2011-12 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of the Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in re-
2 Sunil Jayantilal Shah Vs ITO opening the assessment u/s. 147 of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026