JAYANTILAL RAICHAND SHAH,SURAT vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue to the AO for re-examination of documents submitted by the assessee, which were not produced before the AO. This was done in the interest of justice to determine the actual capital gain.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared capital gains for AY 2020-21. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 36,36,330/- to the capital gains, citing failure to adopt market value and capitalization of interest, and unexplained borrowed funds.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO correctly computed the capital gains by disallowing capitalized interest and questioning the utilization of borrowed funds. Whether the assessee provided sufficient evidence for the computation of capital gains.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not explicitly mentioned in the provided text, but related to capital gains computation and substantiation of expenses/borrowings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay
PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [In short, ‘the ld. CIT(A)’] dated 22/09/2025 for the assessment year (AY) 2020-21 wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
"
On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming the action of Assessing Officer in making addition of Rs.36,36,330/- to the total returned income shown under the head long term capital gain.
It is therefore prayed that the abo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026