PALM INFRAPROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,LUCKNOW vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(1), LUCKNOW-NEW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as prayed. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the NFAC. During the pendency of the appeal, a fresh assessment order was passed, against which the assessee has filed a new appeal. Consequently, the assessee sought to withdraw the current appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be permitted to withdraw the appeal due to subsequent developments in the assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 251,Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, J.M.:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 09.12.2024, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NFAC) for Assessment Year 2014-15. 2.0 During the course of hearing, the Ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee (Ld. A.R.) filed and application dated 12.05.2026 for withdrawal of the appeal. The contents of the application read as under: “Dated: 12.05.2026 Before the - Hon'ble Members, Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'A', Lucknow. May it please your Honours,
ITA No.111/LKW/2025 Sub: Request to permit withdrawal of appeal ITA No. 111/LKW- 2025 for A.Υ. 2014-15 in the case of Palm Infraproperties Pvt. Ltd. (PAN: AAGCP8252Q)
The captioned
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 251
- Jitendrakumar Bhikhabhai Shrimali, Mehsana vs ITO Ward 1, MehsaanaITA 1290/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO(Exemption), Ward, Jaipur vs Raj Rishi Bhartihari Matsya University…ITA 1167/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Urun Vividh Karyakari Vikas Society, Walwa vs ITO WD-5, SangliITA 472/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Shyam Sunder, Ballabgarh vs ITO, Ward 2(3), WardITA 1339/DEL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Shyam Sunder, Ballabgarh vs ITO, Ward 2(3), FaridabadITA 1295/DEL/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026