ASHWANI DHAWAN,GURGAON vs. ITO WARD 1(1), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The assessee is to be given a reasonable opportunity to make submissions.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(A). The assessment was reopened under Section 148, and the Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 144 due to the assessee's lack of response.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment and the dismissal of the appeal by the CIT(A) were justified without affording the assessee a proper opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN
PER SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is directed against an ex-parte order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short ‘the CIT(A)’] dated 26.12.2025, for Assessment Year 2019-20.
Submissions made by ld. DR heard, orders of the lower authorities examined. The assessment for AY 2019-20 in the case of assessee was reopened and notice u/s.148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) was issued to the assessee on 29.03.2023. In response to notice u/s.148 of the Act, the assessee filed return of income declaring total income of Rs.44,29,310/- under the head salary, income from house property and profits from business or professional. Thereafter, no further submissions were made by assessee in response to notice u/s.142(1) of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) in absence of any reply of the assessee, completed the assessment u/s.144 of the Act. The assessee assailed
ITA 2071/DEL/2026 ASHWANI DHAWAN the additions made by AO in appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) vide impugned order dismissed appeal of the assessee in ex-parte proceedings.
Considering entire facts of the case and in the interest of justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the matter back to the AO for denovo assessment, after affording reasonable opportunity of making submissions to the assessee, in accordance with law.
The AO shall serve notice(s) to the assessee on the email address provided in Form No. 36 i.e. ashwanis.dawan@gmail.com in addition to notice on email address available on portal of Department. The assessee upon service of notice shall respond to the same, without fail.
In the result, impugned order is set aside and appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on Tuesday the 07th day of July, 2026
Sd/- Sd/- S RIFAUR RAHMAN VIKAS AWASTHY ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi Dated: 27-Jul-2026
Copy to: ASHWANI DHAWAN, W-1A, 115 DLF WELLINGTON ESTATE, 1 PHASE-5, DLF GURGAON-122002, HARYANA 2 ITO WARD 1(1), NEW DELHI 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, DELHI BENCH 5 GUARD FILE
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026