VIKASH KUMAR SAW,CHAKRADHARPUR, CHAIBASA vs. ITO WARDITO WARD 3(4), CHAIBASA, CHAIBASA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee did not come with clean hands, as evidenced by the claim of notices going to spam and seeking adjournments. Since no documentary evidence supported the reopening claim and the assessee failed to produce evidence before lower authorities, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an ex parte order of the CIT(A) concerning a reopened assessment. The assessee argued that the reopening was for verification of issues already considered in the original assessment and that notices went to spam, leading to non-cooperation.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was justified and whether the assessee's non-cooperation and failure to produce evidence warranted dismissal of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 144,Section 154
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
This is the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. NFAC/2015-16/10129869 dated 30/01/2026 for the A.Y. 2016-17. 2. Shri Sumit Mittal, ld. A.R. is represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Sandipan Khan, ld. Sr.DR is represented on behalf of the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessment has been reopened under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act). It was the submission that the original assessment had been completed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 12/12/2018. It was the submission that the assessment has been reopened for doing verification of the issues which have already be
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026