SUKHBIR SINGH,HARYANA vs. ITO WARD -2, ROHTAK
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order. During the hearing, the assessee expressed a desire to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw its appeal before the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “H”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “H”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 768/Del/2026 (A.Y 2020-21 Sukhbir Singh Vs. ITO VPO Jharli, District Ward-2 Jhajjar Haryana, 124125 Aayakar Bhawan, Rohtak, Haryana (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: CVHPS8680Q
Assessee by : Naveen Kumar Goyal, CA (Virtual) Revenue by: Ms. Priyanka Durbey, Sr. DR
Date of Hearing 20/06/2026 Date of pronouncement 20/07/2026
O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, J. M.: The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order
dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax
(Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre- Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as
the Ld. CIT(A)] under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter
referred to as ‘the Act’) arising out of the Assessment Order dated03.02.2025
passed by the Assessment Unit, Income-tax Department (hereinafter
referred to as ‘the ld. AO’) under Section 147 r.w.s 144 read with section
144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act for Short) for Assessment Year 2020-
21.
2 ITA No. 768/DEL/2026 Sukhbir Singh
At the time of hearing, learned counsel of the assessee submits
that the assessee wants to withdraw its instant appeal.
Learned Department representative submits that he has no
objection to the instant withdrawal of appeal. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20/07/2026. Sd/- Sd/- (KRINWANT SAHAY) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated:28/07/2026
R. Naheed, Sr PS Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
3 ITA No. 768/DEL/2026 Sukhbir Singh
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026