DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. VIJAY KUMAR SAHU INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, RANCHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 153C was invalid because the assessee's AO did not record independent satisfaction. Following High Court precedents, the Tribunal quashed the notice and the consequential assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged proceedings initiated under Section 153C, arguing that the Assessing Officer (AO) of the searched person lacked independent satisfaction and that the assessee's AO also failed to record any satisfaction. Documents were seized during a search on a third party, leading to the initiation of 153C proceedings against the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether proceedings under Section 153C are valid without independent satisfaction recorded by the assessee's Assessing Officer. Whether the satisfaction note of the searched person's AO is sufficient for initiating proceedings against the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
ITA No. 201/Ran/2025 is an appeal filed by the assessee and ITA No. 258/Ran/2025 is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A), Patna-3, Patna dated 17/04/2025 for the A.Y. 2020-21. 2. Shri Devesh Poddar, ld AR appeared for the assessee and H. Robindro Singh, ld. CIT-DR appeared for the revenue.
ITA No. 201 & 258/Ran/2025
It was su
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026