CHALLAPALLI NAGA KIRAN KUMAR,GUNTUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since there was no difference between the income in the original processed return and the assessed income, Section 270A was not applicable. The revised return was considered non-est as it was not processed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an original return, then a revised return claiming deductions, which was later requested not to be processed. The assessment was completed based on the original return, and subsequently, a penalty was levied under Section 270A.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the penalty levied under Section 270A when there was no difference in income between the processed return and the assessed income, and the applicability of Section 270A(2)(a) in such circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
PER SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless
ITA 192/VIZ/2026 Challapalli Naga Kiran Kumar
Appeal Centre, Delhi vide DIN: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1084973740(1) arising out of asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026