CHALLAPALLI NAGA KIRAN KUMAR,GUNTUR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

ITA 192/VIZ/2026Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 July 2026AY 2020-217 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since there was no difference between the income in the original processed return and the assessed income, Section 270A was not applicable. The revised return was considered non-est as it was not processed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an original return, then a revised return claiming deductions, which was later requested not to be processed. The assessment was completed based on the original return, and subsequently, a penalty was levied under Section 270A.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the validity of the penalty levied under Section 270A when there was no difference in income between the processed return and the assessed income, and the applicability of Section 270A(2)(a) in such circumstances.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 270A,Section 143(1),Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM

PER SHRI OMKARESHWAR CHIDARA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless

ITA 192/VIZ/2026 Challapalli Naga Kiran Kumar

Appeal Centre, Delhi vide DIN: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1084973740(1) arising out of asses

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 270A

All 4,156 judgments and leading authorities on Section 270A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →