ANJALI ROHIT PANCHAL,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 32 (1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLENARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & HON’BLE MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER:NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 07.11.2025, impugned herein, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2010-11. 1 Anjali Rohit Panchal
In the instant case, the Assessing Officer (in short, the “AO”) made various additions. For the sake of convenience, we adjudicate the issues separately.
The first issu
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.