INDUMATI VISHWANATH KABADI,GADAG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, HUBLI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2196/BANG/2026Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 August 2026AY 2019-20203 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not decided all grounds of appeal while passing an ex parte order. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of 26 days, which was condoned. The assessee contended that the CIT(A) order was ex parte and they were not given sufficient opportunity to be heard.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) order was passed without providing sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee and if all grounds of appeal were considered.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE

Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US

आदेश / ORDER

PER SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)- NFAC dated 10-Feb-2026 for the Assessment Year 2019-20.

2.

There is a delay of 26 days in filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal. Assessee filed application for condonation of delay supported by an affidavit. For the reasons stated in the application for condonation of

ITA 2196/BANG/2026 INDUMATI VISHWANATH KABADI

delay supported by affidavit, delay of 26 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.

3.

The ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the impugned order of the CIT(A) is ex parte and the assessee has not been provided with sufficient opportunity of being heard. Thus, sought for allowing the appeal.

4.

Per contra, the ld. DR relying on the orders of the lower authorities sought for dismissal of the appeal.

5.

We have heard both the parties and perused the material on record. The ld. CIT(A) while deciding the first appeal ex parte has not decided all the grounds of appeal of the assessee. Considering the above facts and circumstances, we set aside the order of the CIT(Appeals) and remand the matter to the file of the CIT(Appeals) with a direction to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law. Needless to say that assessee shall be provided with opportunity of being heard. All the contentions of the assessee are kept open.

6.

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 03rd August, 2026.

Sd/- Sd/-

WASEEM AHMED YOGESH KUMAR US ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Bangalore Dated: the 03rd August, 2026. /Desai S Murthy/

ITA 2196/BANG/2026 INDUMATI VISHWANATH KABADI

Copy to:

INDUMATI VISHWANATH KABADI, 1 K C RANI ROAD, OPPOSITE MODEL HIGH SCHOOL, GADAG-582101, KARNATAKA INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, 2 CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI, HUBLI-DHARWAD-580025, KARNATAKA 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE CIT(APPEALS) 5 THE D.R., ITAT, BANGALORE BENCH

BY ORDER

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY I.T.A.T., BANGALORE

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →