MAGMA IRON PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. DCIT/ACIT CENCIR 2(2),NAG, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 270A was not in accordance with the law because it failed to specify the particular clause of Section 270A(9) under which the penalty was being levied. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals challenge the penalty levied under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act. The primary contention is that the show cause notice issued by the Assessing Officer was invalid as it did not specify the exact limb (under-reporting or mis-reporting) under which the penalty was initiated.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty under Section 270A is valid when the show cause notice does not specify the exact limb of under-reporting or mis-reporting. Whether a penalty can be levied without specifying the specific clause of Section 270A(9).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SMC BENCH,
Before: Dr. MANISH BORAD
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, AM :
This appeal at the instance of assessee is directed against the order passed by Ld. CIT(A)-3, Nagpur u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 20.03.2026 which is arising out of the Assessment Order passed u/s. 270 of the IT Act dated 25.09.2025. 2. Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in ITA No 419/NAG/2026:-
Whether the learned CIT (A) is justified in law and fact in affirming an order levying penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026