LIYAKAT MIRAHMAD MUJAWAR,KOLHAPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1, KOLHAPUR, KOLHAPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 176/PUN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 August 2026AY 2015-164 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back for fresh adjudication. The assessee was granted one more opportunity to present their case with evidence, adhering to principles of natural justice.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer made additions for unexplained cash deposits and investments after the assessee failed to file a return or respond to notices. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions and dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without considering potential reasons for non-compliance, and whether principles of natural justice were followed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69A,Section 69,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 133(6),Section 144,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE

Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE

Hearing: 23.07.2026Pronounced: 04.08.2026

आदेशकीप्रतितितिअग्रेतिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अिीिार्थी / The Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. तिभागीय प्रतितिति, आयकर अिीिीय अतिकरण, “A” बेंच, पुणे/ DR, ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. गार्डफ़ाइि / Guard File. 5. //True Copy//

आदेशािुसार / BY ORDER,

Assistant Registrar, आयकर अिीिीय अतिकरण,/ ITAT, Pune.

More judgments on Section 69A

All 15,297 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →