CHINTAKUNTA MUNAYAGARI GOPAL,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal challenges a penalty order under Section 271AAA for AY 2011-2012. The primary contention is that the penalty order is barred by limitation as per Section 275(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty order was indeed barred by limitation. The period of limitation for imposing penalty is six months from the end of the financial year in which proceedings were initiated or six months from the end of the month in which the order of the CIT(A) or Tribunal is received by the Pr. CIT, whichever is later.
What were the issues?
The key issue is whether the penalty order was passed within the prescribed time limit under Section 275(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, considering the dates of the Tribunal's order and the Assessing Officer's 'giving effect' order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA G
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order dated 06.09.2025 of the Ld. CIT(A), Hyderabad-11, Hyderabad arising from the penalty order passed u/sec.271AAA of the Income Tax Act [in short "the Act"], 1961, for the assessment year 2011-2012. 2. The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
1) The order of
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271AAA
- Rosy Blue (India) Private Limited, Mumbai vs Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central…ITA 3351/MUM/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed17 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2401/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2400/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2399/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- B Nanji Enterprises Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2398/AHD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S S M Agri Exports Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer/ Avato Ward-52, Zone-3, DelhiDelhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Reliable Accessories Private Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 61,Zone 5,Delhi & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Global Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Shakuntlam Associates Through Its Proprietor Mr Ashok Aggarwal vs. Goods And Services Tax Council Through The Secretary GST Council Secretariat & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Rachit Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026