CHATTERBHUJ AGARWAL,HOWRAH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 46, KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1973/KOL/2026Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 August 2026AY 2018-20193 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without hearing the assessee and did not decide all grounds on merits. Therefore, the matter was remanded for a fresh decision.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the NFAC was dismissed without providing an opportunity of being heard. The assessee argued that this violated principles of natural justice.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee, thereby violating principles of natural justice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH,

Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY

For Appellant: Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA
For Respondent: Shri Ambrish Mishra, DR
Hearing: 03.08.2026Pronounced: 05.08.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GOPALAN GURUSAMY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.1973/KOL/2026 Assessment Year: 2018-19

Chatterbhuj Agarwal Vs. DCIT, Circle-46, Kolkata 108, Girish Ghosh Road, Howrah, West Bengal-711101 [PAN: AEQPA4949A] APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA Respondent by : Shri Ambrish Mishra, DR Date of hearing : 03.08.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 05.08.2026 O R D E R PER YOGESH KUMAR U.S., JUDICIAL MEMBER: This Appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of the NFAC, Delhi (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 09.04.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”, for short) for the Assessment Year 2018-19.

2.

Brief facts of the case are that, an Assessment Order came to be passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 18.03.2024 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the Assessment Order dated 18.03.2024, Assessee filed an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide Order dated 09.04.2026, dismissed the Appeal of the

ITA No.1973/Kol/2026 Chatterbhuj Agarwal; A.Y: 2018-19 Assessee. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 09.04.2026, Assessee filed the present Appeal.

3.

The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee vehemently submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has provided no opportunity of being heard to the Assessee and in violation of principals of natural justice, dismissed the appeal of the Assessee.

4.

Per contra, the Ld. Ld. Departmental Representative relying on the orders of the Ld. CIT(A) sought for dismissal of the Appeal.

5.

We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It can be seen from the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the impugned order has been passed ex-parte without hearing the Assessee. It is further observed that while deciding the Appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided all the grounds of Appeal of the Assessee on its merits. Considering the facts that the Assessee has not participated in the first Appellate proceedings, in the interest of natural justice, we remand the matter to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with a direction to the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the Appeals afresh on its merits in accordance with law after providing opportunity of being heard to the Assessee.

ITA No.1973/Kol/2026 Chatterbhuj Agarwal; A.Y: 2018-19 6. In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 05.08.2026. Sd/- Sd/- (GOPALAN GURUSAMY) (YOGESH KUMAR U.S.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 05.08.2026 DP, PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. Pr. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. CIT(DR) //TRUE COPY//

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →