INDROX GLOBAL PVT LTD,DELHI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order and remanded the appeal back to the CIT(A). The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeal afresh after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) due to non-compliance. The assessee requested one more opportunity to provide necessary details and make due compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee is sustainable. The need for a fresh hearing to ensure natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 20.01.2026 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short) for Assessment Year 2020-21 arising out of the assessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act dated 30.03.2025.
At the outset, it is seen that Ld. CIT(A) has passed the ex-parte order as the assessee has not made any compliance in spite of several opportunities given. Before us, Ld. AR of the assessee submits that if one more opportunity is provided,
2 ITA No.3181/Del/2024 Indox Global Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT all the necessary details along with the submission will be provided and due compliance will be made before the Ld. CIT(A).
Considering the facts and the request of the assessee and in the interest of justice, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remanded the present appeal to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for deciding the appeal of the assessee afresh after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, all the grounds of appeal of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 05. 08.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (ANUBHAV SHARMA) (MANISH AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 05.08.2026 *PK, Sr. PS* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026