SANCHAR NEST SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI LIMITED,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT /ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD
What were the facts?
A search was conducted on the Alankit Group, and subsequently, seized material and a satisfaction note were handed over to the Assessing Officer (AO) for initiating proceedings under Section 153C. The AO made additions to the assessee's income for AYs 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17, which were upheld by the CIT(A).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the proceedings under Section 153C were not permissible as the date of handing over of the seized material to the AO occurred after April 1, 2021, making the notice invalid as per Section 153C(3). Consequently, the assessment orders were quashed.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the notice issued under Section 153C, specifically whether it was issued in accordance with the amended provisions of Section 153C(3) concerning the date of search initiation for non-searched persons.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 153C(3),Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 69C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA Nos.1868 to 1870/DEL/2026 SANCHAR NEST SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI LIMITED IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “A” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2014-15 SANCHAR NEST SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI Vs. DCIT/ACIT, LIMITED, Central Circle, ITO, 206-207, Ansal Satyam, RDC, Raj Nagar, CGO Complex-1, Hapur Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201001. Chungi, Ghaziabad, Uttar PAN No. AAGAS0241Q Pradesh 201001. Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2015-16 SANCHAR NEST SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI Vs. DCIT/ACIT, LIMITED, Central Circle, ITO, 206-207, Ansal Satyam, RDC, Raj Nagar, CGO Complex-1, Hapur Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201001. Chungi, Ghaziabad, Uttar PAN No. AAGAS0241Q Pradesh 201001. Appellant Respondent & Assessment Year: 2016-17 SANCHAR NEST SAHAKARI AWAS SAMITI Vs. DCIT/ACIT, LIMITED, Central Circle, ITO, 206-207, Ansal Satyam, RDC, Raj Nagar, CGO Complex-1, Hapur Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201001. Chungi, Ghaziabad, Uttar PAN No. AAGAS0241Q Pradesh 201001. Appellant Respondent Assessee by Shri Akhilesh Kumar, AR & Shri Govind Agarwal, Adv.
Revenue by Shri Jitender Singh, CIT DR Date of hearing: 16.07.2026 Pronouncem
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, JunagadhITA 836/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Late Hetalkumar Gunvantlal Soni (Through… vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 462/AHD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026