NATIONAL SKILLS FOUNDATION OF INDIA,GURGAON vs. ITO EXEMPTIONS, WARD - FARIDABAD, FARIDABAD, HARYANA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee's arguments were not effectively controverted by the Revenue. It noted that the CIT(E) should examine the objects and genuineness of activities, and that the assessee's activities could fall under 'advancement of any other object of general public utility'.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust promoting education and skill development, applied for registration under Section 12AB and 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the applications, citing that the activities did not amount to 'education' as per Section 2(15) and the genuineness of activities was not established.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's skill development activities qualify as 'education' under Section 2(15) and whether the genuineness of its activities was properly assessed by the CIT(Exemption) when rejecting the registration applications.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 5097/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) ITA No. 5098/Del/2026 (A.Y 2026-27) National Skills Foundation Vs. CIT (Exemption), of India. C/o Subash Chandigarh, Room No. Agarwal & Associates, 1, 5th Floor, C. R. Advocates Siddha Gibson,1 Building, Himalaya Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2nd Marg, Sector 17-E, Floor, Kolkata-700069 Chandigarh (UT), 160017. (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AABTN3302M
Assessee by : Sh. Subhash Agarwal, Adv Revenue by: Shri Rajesh Mahajan, CIT DR
Date of Hearing 22/06/2026 Date of pronouncement 06/08/2026 O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, J. M.: These two appeals by the assessees are directed against the
order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), New Delhi
[hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. CIT(E)] both dated 16.03.2026 passed
under section 12A and 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter
referred to as ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year 2026-27.
The Assessees is in appeals against the orders of rejection of
the applications filed in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under
Section 12AB and 80G of the Act.
Heard the parties, perused the records.
2 ITA Nos. 5097 & 5098/Del/2026 Nation Skill Foundation of India 4. The Assessee a trust charitable in nature established with the
primary object of promotion of education and skill development. The
activities carried on by the appellant consist of structured skill
development programmes, vocational training and livelihood
enhancement initiatives aimed at improving employability and
empowering youth, particularly belonging to rural and
underprivileged sections of society. Such objects was enunciated in
the registered deed dated 21.08.2009 placed at page 41 of the paper-
book filed before us. However, the activities of the appellant do not
amount to "education" within the meaning of section 2(15) of the Act
and further that the appellant has not been established the
genuineness of its activities and, therefore, relying upon the
Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Noble
Education Society Vs. CIT reported in 143 Taxmann.com 276 (SC),
the Ld. CIT(E) rejected both the applications.
It is the case of the Assessee that no adverse finding has been
recorded in so far as the activities of the Assessee is concerned by
the Ld. CIT(E). Further that at this stage of considering the
application for registration and/or renewal and/or grant of 80G of
the Act, the Ld. CIT(E) is only empowered to examine that whether
the object of the Assessee is charitable, and also the genuineness of
the activities. As the Appellant fulfills, both these conditions
3 ITA Nos. 5097 & 5098/Del/2026 Nation Skill Foundation of India rejection is not sustainable and, therefore, liable to be quashed as
was the crux of the submission made by the Ld. AR Sh. Subhash
Agarwal. In this regard, the Assessee relied upon a Judgment
passed by the Hon’ble Chandigarh Bench in the case of Institute of
Model Education Society Vs. CIT, wherein it has been held that at
this stage of grant of registration under Section 12A of the Act, the
competent authority is required to examine the objects of the
trust/institution and the genuineness of its activities. Since,
nothing contrary to the above has been found and further that even
if it does not fall within the expression ‘education’ the same is
undoubtedly covered the expression, ‘advancement of any other
object of general public utility’ in terms of provision of Section 2(15)
of the Act as further contended by the Ld. AR. Thus, the order
impugned is bad in law and to be set aside as submitted by him.
The relevant documents in support of the case made out by the
Appellant though furnished before the authority below, the same
were also not considered in its proper perspective as further argued.
The contention made by the Ld. AR, however, has not been able to
be controverted in its proper spirit by the Ld. DR.
Thus, having heard the Ld. Counsels appearing for the
parties and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case, in order to prevent the miscarriage of justice, we would like to
4 ITA Nos. 5097 & 5098/Del/2026 Nation Skill Foundation of India give a further reasonable opportunity to the Appellant to represent
its case before the Ld. CIT(E) effectively. Thus, we dispose of these
appeals by remitting the issues to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for
proper consideration of the same in the light of the Judgment passed
by the Hon’ble Chandigarh Bench in the case of Institute of Model
Education Society Vs. CIT (supra) and to pass orders strictly in
accordance with law upon granting an opportunity of being heard to
the Appellant and upon considering the evidence on record or any
other evidence which the Appellant may choose to file at the time of
hearing of the matters.
In the result, both the Appeals are allowed for statistical
purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 06/08/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (KRINWANT SAHAY) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 06 /08/2026 R. Naheed, Sr PS
5 ITA Nos. 5097 & 5098/Del/2026 Nation Skill Foundation of India
More judgments on Section 2(15)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026