VIKASH GUPTA,GHAZIABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), GHAZIABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened based on information that he received Rs. 40 lakh as bribe. The Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 30 lakh as unexplained income under Section 69A and initiated penalty proceedings. The CIT(A) upheld the additions.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO failed to establish that the assessee was the owner of the money received, and therefore, Section 69A was not applicable. The lender had treated the amount as a loan in its audited accounts.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of Rs. 30 lakh under Section 69A was justified when the assessee claimed it as an unsecured loan, and whether the reassessment proceedings were valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 151,Section 69A,Section 271(1)(c),Section 142(1),Section 151A,Section 130
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’, NEW DELHI
PER NAVEEN CHANDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This captioned appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [‘CIT(A)’ in short] dated 29.08.2025 arising from the assessment order dated 30.03.2022 passed by the Income Tax Officer, National e- Assessment Centre, Delhi under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) concerning Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18. [A.Y 2017-18]
The brief fact of the case is that t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- M/S Vibrations And Ors. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Chandni Chawk And Princep Street Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Sheela Foam Limited And Anr vs. The Deputy Commissioner State Tax Shibpur Charge And OrsCalcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Mihir Kumar Biswas vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Revenue, State Tax, Krishnanagar Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Vasu Chauhan vs. State Of UttarakhandUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026