RAJINDER KUMAR,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(3), DEHRADUN
What were the facts?
The assessee received ex-gratia and leave encashment upon early retirement from BSNL. Initially offered to tax, the assessee later claimed exemption under Sections 10(10B) and 10(10AA) via a rectification application. The claim for ex-gratia was allowed, but the leave encashment exemption was restricted to the pre-enhanced limit.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the enhanced limit for leave encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA) should be applied retrospectively, following the beneficial nature of the amendment and various coordinate bench decisions. The assessee is entitled to the enhanced exemption limit.
What were the issues?
Whether the enhanced limit for leave encashment exemption, notified in 2023, is applicable retrospectively to assessment years prior to the notification, specifically AY 2020-21.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH “SMC” DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal arises from order dated 31.03.2026, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter as “the Act”), by Ld. Addl./JCIT(Appeals)-9, Mumbai.
1 In this case, the assessee had received certain ex-gratia and leave encashment from M/s BSNL on accepting early retirement. It is seen that the assessee had offered the receipts under these two heads to tax, apparently due to ignorance of law. The Ld. AO, CPC processed the return of the assessee and accepted the returned income. Thereafter, the assessee apparently moved a rectification application claiming such 1 RAJINDER KUMAR
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026